Cases 11 - 20 of 106
Sealed Defendant #2 v. USA
as 8:2020cv01389
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Patrick Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Fava v. Ward et al
as 9:2020cv00156
Defendant:
Joseph T. Ward, Jr., Ryan A. Albright, Lieutenant Lloyd J. Reynolds and others
Plaintiff:
James P. Fava
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Collado
as 2:2019cv03407
Respondent:
Jaifa Collado
Petitioner:
Lloyd Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lloyd v. Dearie et al
as 1:2019cv03179
Defendant:
Hillel Greene, Raymond J. Dearie and Lauren Elbert
Plaintiff:
Annis R. Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lloyd v. Petrucci et al
as 1:2019cv02387
Defendant:
Warden Petrucci and CPT. M. Whinnery
Plaintiff:
Annis R. Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haynes v. City Of New York et al
as 1:2019cv01925
Defendant:
Department of Correction Officers John/Jane Does #1-25, New York City Department of Correction Commissioner Cynthia Brann, New York City Department of Correction and others
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Haynes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lloyd v. Petrucci et al
as 1:2019cv01380
Defendant:
Captain M. Whinnery and Warden Petrucci
Plaintiff:
Annis R. Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lloyd v. Morton
as 1:2018cv06979
Petitioner:
Derrick Lloyd
Respondent:
Robert I. Morton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
D.J.C.V. et al v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
as 1:2018cv09115
Respondent:
Anthony Mele, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Director Thomas Decker and others
Petitioner:
D.J.C.V., a minor, Mr. C and D.J.C.V
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Davis v. Lee
as 1:2018cv05379
Petitioner:
Lloyd S. Davis
Respondent:
William Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
