Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Lonnie Lee Poslof v. People of The States of California et al
as 5:2023cv02574
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Lee Poslof, Sr.
Defendant:
People of The States of California, Jhon Pacheco, George Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lonnie Lee Poslof, Sr. v. Brian D. Phillips
as 5:2023cv01199
Petitioner:
Lonnie Lee Poslof, Sr.
Respondent:
Brian D. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Poslof, Sr. v. Phillips
as 1:2023cv00909
Petitioner:
Lonnie Lee Poslof, Sr.
Respondent:
Brian D. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lonnie Lee Poslof, Sr v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2022cv01105
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Lee Poslof, Sr.
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections, Tresa Cishenros, Sgt. Brewer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lonnie Poslof, Sr. v. Stuart Sherman
as 19-72203
Petitioner:
LONNIE LEE POSLOF, Sr.
Respondent:
STUART SHERMAN, Warden
Lonnie Lee Poslof Sr v. Stuart Sherman
as 5:2019cv01422
Respondent:
Stuart Sherman
Petitioner:
Lonnie Lee Poslof Sr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Poslof v. Deuel Vocational Institution et al
as 2:2017cv02422
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Lee Poslof, Sr.
Defendant:
Deuel Vocational Institution, Sable and G. Malet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lonnie Lee Poslof, Sr v. Stu Sherman
as 5:2015cv02526
Petitioner:
Lonnie Lee Poslof, Sr
Respondent:
Stu Sherman
Poslof v. CA Dept of Corrections and Rehabilitations, et al
as 1:2013cv01935
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Lee Poslof, Sr.
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations, CSATF/SP Corcoran II, Ralph Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Poslof v. CA Dept of Corrections and Rehabilitations, et al
as 2:2013cv02412
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Lee Poslof, Sr.
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations, CSATF/SP Corcoran II, Ralph Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
