Cases 1 - 10 of 79
Acdmy of Allergy v. LA Health Service
as 23-30925
Plaintiff:
Academy of Allergy & Asthma in Primary Care and United Biologics, L.L.C., doing business as United Allergy Services
Defendant:
Louisiana Health Service & Indemnity Company, doing business as Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Louisiana, Humana, Incorporated, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas, Incorporated and others
Louisiana Health Service & Indemnity Company et al v. Celgene Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv07871
Plaintiff:
Louisiana Health Service & Indemnity Company individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated doing business as Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Louisiana and HMO Louisiana, Inc.
Defendant:
Celgene Corporation, Bristol Myers Squibb Company, Aurobindo Pharma Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
LOUISIANA HEALTH SERVICE & INDEMNITY COMPANY WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN v. USA
as 1:2023cv00642
Plaintiff:
LOUISIANA HEALTH SERVICE & INDEMNITY COMPANY WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF KANSAS CITY WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN v. USA
as 1:2023cv00641
Plaintiff:
BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF KANSAS CITY WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN
Defendant:
USA
Consolidated Plaintiff:
LOUISIANA HEALTH SERVICE & INDEMNITY COMPANY WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN, HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL PLAN FOR BLUECROSS BLUESHIELD OF SC, THE CAREFIRST FLEXIBLE BENEFITS PLAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
LOUISIANA HEALTH SERVICE & INDEMNITY COMPANY v. USA
as 1:2023cv00152
Plaintiff:
LOUISIANA HEALTH SERVICE & INDEMNITY COMPANY doing business as BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF LOUISIANA
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. et al v. Anthem Inc et al
as 2:2022cv01256
Plaintiff:
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc., Automobile Club of Southern California, Darling Ingredients Inc and others
Defendant:
Anthem Inc d/b/a ANthem Blue Cross LIfe and Health Insurance Company agent of WELLPOINT INC, Blue Cross of California, Blue Cross of Southern California and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
JetBlue Airways Corporation et al v. Anthem Inc et al
as 2:2022cv00558
Plaintiff:
JetBlue Airways Corporation, JetBlue Airways Group Health Insurance Plan, Kraft Heinz Company, The and others
Defendant:
Anthem Inc formerly doing business as WELLPOINT INC, Blue Cross of California, Blue Cross of Southern California, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 2:2022cv00265
Defendant:
Anthem Inc formerly known as WELLPOINT INC doing business as Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company doing business as Blue Cross of California doing business as BLUE CROSS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA doing business as Blue Cross of Northern C, Independence Health Group Inc and Independence Hospital Indemnity Plan Inc, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama and others
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, New York City Transit Authority, Manhattan And Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 1:2021cv09101
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, New York City Transit Authority, Manhattan And Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority and others
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, PREMERA and Premera Blue Cross, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Arizona, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Reyes v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 2:2021cv01235
Plaintiff:
Mishanta Reyes
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Anthem Inc, Health Care Service Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
