Cases 1 - 10 of 30
CONLEY v. LOWNDES COUNTY JAIL et al
as 7:2023cv00035
Plaintiff:
BRANDON CARL CONLEY
Defendant:
LOWNDES COUNTY JAIL and SOUTHERN HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARKER v. FUKES et al
as 7:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
EDWARD D PARKER
Defendant:
Probation Officer KIMBERLY FUKES, Judge JOHN KENT EDWARDS, JR, LOWNDES COUNTY JAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRUTCHLEY v. LOWNDES COUNTY JAIL et al
as 7:2023cv00017
Petitioner:
ADAM WADE CRUTCHLEY
Respondent:
LOWNDES COUNTY JAIL and SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS INC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crutchley v. Lowndes County Jail et al
as 1:2023cv00274
Plaintiff:
Adam Wade Crutchley
Defendant:
Lowndes County Jail and Southern Health Partners Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. LOWNDES COUNTY JAIL
as 7:2022cv00107
Petitioner:
TRISTAN MATTHEW ANDERSON
Defendant:
LOWNDES COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
PARKER v. LOWNDES COUNTY JAIL
as 7:2022cv00079
Plaintiff:
TASHA MICHELLE PARKER
Defendant:
LOWNDES COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TODD v. LOWNDES COUNTY JAIL, ET AL.
as 7:2021cv00122
Plaintiff:
MOUNTAVIUS ISAIAH TODD
Defendant:
LOWNDES COUNTY JAIL and Captain CLIFTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VICKERS v. LOWNDES COUNTY JAIL
as 7:2021cv00119
Plaintiff:
DARRIEL VICKERS
Defendant:
LOWNDES COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TODD v. LOWNDES COUNTY JAIL et al
as 7:2021cv00102
Plaintiff:
MOUNTAVIUS ISAIAH TODD
Defendant:
LOWNDES COUNTY JAIL, LOWNDES COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, P NESMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gist-Holden et al v. Goote et al
as 1:2021cv04169
Plaintiff:
Hailey Gist-Holden, Briana White and Johnnie Holden
Defendant:
Christopher Goote, Bryan, Kevin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
