Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Stiles v. Kahn et al
as 3:2023cv00577
Plaintiff:
Steven Foster Stiles
Defendant:
Caroline Zapp Kahn, Clark Mathew Stiles, Amity Girt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Downs v. Oregon Board of Parole Members et al
as 3:2023cv00595
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Diane Downs
Defendant:
Oregon Board of Parole Members, Michael Washington, Diane Rea and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00386
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Lowry et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 6:2022cv01514
Plaintiff:
John Lowry and Andrea Lowry
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Reger v. Oregon
as 3:2022cv01318
Petitioner:
Erlene Kay Reger
Respondent:
Oregon, Greta Lowry and Lt. Jim St. Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lowry v. Laney
as 6:2022cv01414
Petitioner:
Shaun Everett Lowry
Respondent:
Garrett Laney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lowry v. Laney
as 3:2022cv01414
Plaintiff:
Shaun Everrett Lowry
Defendant:
Garrett Laney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Halladay v. Hsu et al
as 6:2020cv02015
Defendant:
John Bailey, Patty Cress, Michael Hsu and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey David Halladay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCrary v. Johannesen
as 3:2019cv00303
Defendant:
Jullian Carroll, Thomas M. Ryan, Espana and others
Plaintiff:
Dathan Jude McCrary, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lowry v. Amsberry
as 2:2017cv00702
Respondent:
Ms. Bridgett Amsberry
Petitioner:
Richard Thomas Denton Lowry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
