Cases 1 - 10 of 598
TERRELL v. WHATLEY et al
as 1:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
WILLIE JAMES TERRELL, JR
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER TABATHA WHATLEY, WARDEN BENJAMIN FORD, TARMARSHE SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Wellpath et al
as 3:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Shelton R. Thomas
Defendant:
Wellpath, Jermaine White, Ricky Wilcox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lenz v. Jones et al
as 1:2024cv01510
Plaintiff:
Dakota Lenz
Defendant:
Warden Deshawn Jones, Deputy Warden Polite and Lt Shields
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cardwell v. Roundtree et al
as 1:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Duval F. Cardwell
Defendant:
Sheriff Richard Roundtree, Major Mitchell, Major Rawlings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CONYERS v. JESTER et al
as 5:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
RICHARD CONYERS
Defendant:
WARDEN T JESTER, DEPUTY WARDEN GRAHAM, CAPTAIN HAMILTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POPE v. COOPER et al
as 5:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
FRANKIE WAYNE POPE
Defendant:
DEPUTY COOPER, DEPUTY ROSS, DEPUTY FRITZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gray v. Danforth
as 1:2024cv00985
Petitioner:
Ronald B. Gray
Respondent:
Lt. Danforth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sayles v. Maddox et al
as 1:2024cv00966
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Sayles
Defendant:
Chief Sheriff Melody Maddox, Larandy Alcies and Lt Etheridge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TOLES v. NEWSOME et al
as 5:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
QUONTERIOUS TOLES
Defendant:
LT NEWSOME and CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MOODY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TOLES v. NEWSOME et al
as 7:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
QUONTERIOUS TOLES
Defendant:
LT NEWSOME and CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MOODY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
