Cases 1 - 10 of 195
Lucero Jr. v. Blaney
as 5:2024cv02865
Plaintiff:
Albert Benjamin Lucero Jr.
Defendant:
John Blaney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lucero v. Revive Organics, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00613
Plaintiff:
Carly Lucero
Defendant:
Revive Organics, Inc. a Foreign Corporation doing business as Revive Superfoods and Miski Organics Superfoods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Venue
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00409
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
(PC) Lucero v. Richards
as 2:2024cv00521
Plaintiff:
Timothy Paul Lucero
Defendant:
Ramisha Slocum Richards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00363
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
(HC) Lucero v. The People of the State of California
as 2:2024cv00268
Petitioner:
Timothy Paul Lucero
Respondent:
The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Lucero v. The People of the State of California
as 2:2024cv00267
Petitioner:
Timothy Paul Lucero
Respondent:
The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sophia Maria Resendez et al v. Nicholas Mark Lucero et al
as 5:2023cv02576
Plaintiff:
Sophia Maria Resendez and Robert LeRoy Lucero, Sr.
Defendant:
Nicholas Mark Lucero and Does 1 to 10
(HC) Lucero v. The People
as 2:2023cv02852
Petitioner:
Timothy Paul Lucero
Respondent:
The People
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Lucero v. State of California
as 2:2023cv02844
Plaintiff:
Timothy Paul Lucero
Defendant:
State of California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
