Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Burns v. Spratley et al
as 6:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Candi L. Burns
Defendant:
Tobias J. Spratley, Paul F. Rajinder, Gurdev Trucking, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Moore v. Spratley et al
as 6:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Ian M. Moore
Defendant:
Tobias J. Spratley, Paul F. Rajinder, Gurdev Trucking, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Fawley v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 2:2023cv00243
Petitioner:
Benjamin W. Fawley
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia, John Doe, Harold W. Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fawley v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 2:2022cv00456
Plaintiff:
Benjamin W. Fawley
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, John Doe, Harold W. Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00176
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00113
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Ellis vs. Lucero, et al
as 1:2018cv01258
Petitioner:
Ricardo Ellis
Respondent:
Janet Napolitano, Eric Holder and Enrique Lucero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lucero et al v. MLRG, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01082
Plaintiff:
Maurilla Lucero and Alejandrina Santos De Ruiz
Defendant:
MLRG, Inc., 1650 WILSON BOULEVARD, LLC and Michael Landrum
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00262
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Romero Gutierres v. Napolitano et al
as 1:2013cv01276
Petitioner:
Rafael Hernesto Romero Gutierres
Respondent:
Janet Napolitano , Enrique Lucero , Thomas Homan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
