Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Devon Tinius v. Luke Choi, et al
as 22-7047
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Devon Tinius
Defendant / Appellee:
Luke Choi, D.C. Metropolitan Police Officer, District of Columbia and Carlton Smith, Metropolitan Police Officer
Brandon Brown v. Luke Choi, et al
as 22-7053
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Brandon Brown
Defendant / Appellee:
Luke Choi, D.C. Metropolitan Police Officer and District of Columbia
BROWN v. CHOI et al
as 1:2022cv00441
Plaintiff:
BRANDON BROWN
Defendant:
LUKE CHOI and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EDWARDS et al v. STATE OF ALABAMA et al
as 1:2022cv00398
Plaintiff:
LUKE EDWARDS, ALABAMA - MISSISSIPPI FARM, INC. and HERITAGE REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT, INC.
Defendant:
STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, IRA DRAYTON PRUITT, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TINIUS v. CHOI et al
as 1:2021cv00907
Plaintiff:
DEVON TINIUS
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and LUKE CHOI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BEY v. EASTERLY et al
as 1:2020cv00608
Defendant:
CATHARINE FRIEND EASTERLY, ALICIA LONG, JOSE M. LOPEZ and others
Plaintiff:
ZAFARAH I. BEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01956
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MCKENZIE v. SAINT LUKE'S HOSPITAL CORPORATION INC.
as 1:2017cv01305
Plaintiff:
NOLAN MCKENZIE
Defendant:
SAINT LUKE'S HOSPITAL CORPORATION INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donald Jones v. Bobby Jindal, et al
as 10-7124
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Donald G. Jones
Defendant - Appellee:
Bobby Jindal, Governor, State of Louisiana, Sue P. Everhart, Republican Party of Louisiana and others
JONES v. JINDAL et al
as 1:2010cv01052
Plaintiff:
DONALD G. JONES
Defendant:
BOBBY JINDAL, STATE OF LOUISIANA, SUE P. EVERHART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
