Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Kelleher v. Boeing Company, et al
as 3:2015cv00893
Defendant:
Beazer East, Inc., CBS Corporation, Industrial Holdings Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Kelleher
Cross Defendant:
Sprinkmann Insulation Inc., United Technologies Corporation and Rohr Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Dryfka v. Trane US, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01019
Defendant:
Trane US, Inc., CBS Corporation, Core Furnace Systems Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Candace Dryfka
Cross Defendant:
General Dynamics Corporation and Zurn Industries LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Dixon v. Bechtel Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv00324
Plaintiff:
Minie L Dixon
Defendant:
Bechtel Corporation, CBS Corporation, General Electric Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moss, Jane v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 3:2011cv00054
Plaintiff:
Jane Moss
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton Company , Albany Felt Company, Inc. , Alfa Laval, Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
Sandusky International, Inc. , Peerless Pump Company , Rapid American Corporation and others
Cross_defendant:
A.W. Chesterton Company , Albany Felt Company, Inc. , Alfa Laval, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LaPresto v. AW Chesterton Company et al
as 2:2011cv00075
Plaintiff:
Anthony R LaPresto
Defendant:
AW Chesterton Company , Bayer CropScience Inc , Bechtel Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott v. Rapid American Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv07760
Plaintiff:
David Lee Scott
Defendant:
Rapid American Corporation, H.B. Fuller Company, Union Carbide Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dearden v. Electro-Motive Diesel, Inc. et al.
as 1:2009cv05325
Defendant:
Georgia-Pacific Corporation, Oakfabco, Inc., Elliott Turbomachinery Company, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Sandra Dearden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
