Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Lutz et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv09232
Plaintiff:
Correnda (Cory) Lutz and Larry Lutz
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lutz et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv06389
Plaintiff:
Michelle Marie Lutz and Brian John Lutz
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lutz et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv05642
Plaintiff:
Marla Lutz and Keith Lutz
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lutz v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv26414
Plaintiff:
Minnie Lutz
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lutz et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv15105
Plaintiff:
Carrie Lutz and Joseph Lutz
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dittrich et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv03752
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC , Johnson & Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Lutz Dittrich and Magdelena Dittrich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Waite et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2012cv02001
Plaintiff:
Windy V. Waite and Jordan Lutz
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Lutz
as 2:2010cv00695
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
John E. Lutz, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 77 U.S.C. § 7777
Court:
Fourth Circuit
›
West Virginia
›
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Type:
Other Statutes
In Re: Office of Disciplinary Counsel
as 2:2008mc00134
Petitioner:
Office of Disciplinary Counsel
Respondent:
John E. Lutz, Jr.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
