Cases 1 - 9 of 9
DURHAM v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2009cv04314
Plaintiff:
MILTON PAUL DURHAM
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, NEW JERSEY STATE PRISONS, MICHELLE R. RICCI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JENKINS et al v. CORZINE et al
as 2:2008cv05720
Plaintiff:
ALONZO JENKINS and LEON FIELDS
Defendant:
JON S. CORZINE, SIMEON F. MOSS, GEORGE W. HAYMAN and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
PATEL v. HAYMAN et al
as 3:2008cv03586
Plaintiff:
DIMPY PATEL
Defendant:
GEORGE HAYMAN, JAMES BARBO, LYDELL B. SHERRER and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BARNES v. SHERRER et al
as 2:2008cv02420
Plaintiff:
HASSAN BARNES
Defendant:
LYDELL B. SHERRER, BRUCE A. HAUCK, PIERRE EMMANUAL and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
RUBIO v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (ICE) et al
as 2:2008cv00092
Petitioner:
RODOLFO RUBIO
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (ICE), DHS-HEADQUARTERS and LYDELL B. SHERRER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
VASQUEZ v. JANTZ et al
as 2:2007cv03754
Plaintiff:
GEORGE VASQUEZ
Defendant:
LISA JANTZ and LYDELL B. SHERRER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER v. BROWN et al
as 2:2007cv02020
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH E. MILLER
Defendant:
DEVON BROWN, JAMES BARBO, GWENDOLYN NOLLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VASQUEZ v. SHERRER et al
as 2:2007cv00988
Petitioner:
GEORGE VASQUEZ
Respondent:
LYDELL B. SHERRER and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, THE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
IANNACE v. HAYMAN et al
as 2:2007cv00272
Plaintiff:
THOMAS A. IANNACE
Defendant:
GEORGE HAYMAN, WILLIAM F. PLANTIER, GRACE ROGERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
