Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Lexos Media IP, LLC v. La-Z-Boy Incorporated
as 6:2021cv00205
Plaintiff:
Lexos Media IP, LLC
Defendant:
La-Z-Boy Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
AR Design Innovations LLC v. LA-Z-BOY, INC.
as 4:2020cv00395
Defendant:
LA-Z-BOY, INC.
Plaintiff:
AR Design Innovations LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
AR Design Innovations LLC v. Ashley Furniture Industries, Inc.
as 4:2020cv00392
Defendant:
Ashley Furniture Industries, Inc.
Plaintiff:
AR Design Innovations LLC
Consolidated Defendant:
LA-Z-BOY, INC. and Ethan Allen Interiors, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Magistrate Judge Christine A Nowak and Scott Woloson
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Megdal Associates, LLC v. LZB
as 17-14292
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MEGDAL ASSOCIATES, LLC
Defendant - Appellant:
LA-Z-BOY INCORPORATED
Megdal Associates, LLC v. La-Z-Boy, Inc.
as 17-11397
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MEGDAL ASSOCIATES, LLC
Defendant - Appellant:
LA-Z-BOY, INC.
La-Z-Boy Incorporated v. Jackson Furniture Industries, Inc.
as 2:2016cv13099
Plaintiff:
La-Z-Boy Incorporated
Defendant:
Jackson Furniture Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Megdal Associates, LLC v. La-Z-Boy, Inc.
as 9:2014cv81476
Plaintiff:
Megdal Associates, LLC
Defendant:
La-Z-Boy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
MEGDAL ASSOCIATES, LLC et al v. LA-Z-BOY INCORPORATED
as 9:2014cv81009
Plaintiff:
MEGDAL ASSOCIATES, LLC and DEWERT ANTRIEBS-UND SYSTEMTECHNIK, GmbH& CO. KG
Defendant:
LA-Z-BOY INCORPORATED
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0145
Interface IP Holdings LLC v. La-Z-Boy Incorporated
as 1:2013cv01564
Plaintiff:
Interface IP Holdings LLC
Defendant:
La-Z-Boy Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Landmark Technology, LLC v. LA-Z-BOY, INC.
as 6:2012cv00226
Plaintiff:
Landmark Technology, LLC
Defendant:
LA-Z-BOY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
