Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Nava v. U.S. Bank NA, successor trustee to Bank of America, NA, successor in interest to LaSalle Bank NA, on behalf of the registered holders of Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities I Trust 2005-HE6, Asset-Ba et al
as 3:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
Maria G Nava
Defendant:
U.S. Bank NA, successor trustee to Bank of America, NA, successor in interest to LaSalle Bank NA, on behalf of the registered holders of Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities I Trust 2005-HE6, Asset-Ba, BEVERLY MITRISIN AS SUBSTITUTE TRUSTEE, U.S. Bank NA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Foreclosure
Nava v. U.S. Bank NA, Successor Trustee to Bank of America, NA, Successor in Interest to LaSalle Bank NA, on behalf of the Registered Holders of Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities I Trust 2005-HE6, Asset-Ba et al
as 3:2020cv00009
Plaintiff:
Maria G. Nava
Defendant:
U.S. Bank NA, Successor Trustee to Bank of America, NA, Successor in Interest to LaSalle Bank NA, on behalf of the Registered Holders of Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities I Trust 2005-HE6, Asset-Ba and Beverly Mitrisin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Juring v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv00649
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., U.S. Bank, NA, Successor Trustee to Bank of America, NA, Successor in Interest to LaSalle Bank NA, as Trustee on Behalf of the Holders of the Washington Mutual Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, WMAL and U.S. Bank, NA
Plaintiff:
David M. Juring
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pittman v. U.S. Bank NA, Successor Trustee to Bank of America, NA, Successor in Intereest to LaSalle Bank NA, on behalf of the Registered Holders of Bear Stearns Asset Banked Securities I Trust 2006-HE5, Asset B et al
as 4:2019cv00397
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., Timothy O'Brien and U.S. Bank NA, Successor Trustee to Bank of America, NA, Successor in Intereest to LaSalle Bank NA, on behalf of the Registered Holders of Bear Stearns Asset Banked Securities I Trust 2006-HE5, Asset B
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Pittman
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191
Robinson v. US Bank NA
as 3:2019cv00101
Plaintiff:
Karen Armelin Robinson
Defendant:
US BANK NA, as TRUSTEE, SUCCESSOR in INTEREST to BANK OF AMERICA, NA as TRUSTEE, SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO LASALLE BANK NA, as TRUSTEE FOR SACO I TRUST 2005-WM3 MORTGAGE BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-, Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC, Power Default Services Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bank of America, National Association As Successor By Merger To LaSalle Bank NA As Trustee For Washington Mutual Asset-Backed Certificates WMABS Series 2007-HE2 Trust v. Elchehabi et al
as 4:2013cv00208
Plaintiff:
Bank of America, National Association As Successor By Merger To LaSalle Bank NA As Trustee For Washington Mutual Asset-Backed Certificates WMABS Series 2007-HE2 Trust
Defendant:
Ziad M. Elchehabi, Veronica Subia, Amoun Awad Elhassan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Smith et al v. U.S. Bank, National Association, As Successor Trustee
as 4:2012cv01461
Plaintiff:
Latoya Smith and Melvin Smith
Defendant:
U.S. National Association, As Successor Trustee to Bank of America, N.A., as Successor by Merger to Lasalle Bank, NA, as Trustee for the Certificate Holders of the MLMI Trust, Mortgage Loan Asset-Back
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Datatreasury Corporation v. Wells Fargo & Company et al
as 2:2006cv00072
Counter Claimant:
Wachovia Corporation, Remitco, LLC, Keybank National Association and others
Defendant:
The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc., The Bank of New York, Magtek, Inc. and others
Not Yet Classified:
Michael T McLemore
Consolidated Defendant:
Datatreasury Corporation and City National Bank
Intervenor Defendant:
Royal Bank of Canada, Toronto-Dominion Bank, Bank of Montreal and others
Petitioner:
FISH & RICHARDSON, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
