Cases 21 - 30 of 239
Bricklayers Insurance and Welfare Fund et al v. Alexandria Tile Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv06364
Plaintiff:
Bricklayers Insurance and Welfare Fund, Bricklayers Pension Fund, Bricklayers Supplemental Annuity Fund and others
Defendant:
Alexandria Tile Company, Inc. and Aly Elsayed
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Bricklayers Insurance and Welfare Fund et al v. Danco Builders Group
as 1:2021cv05901
Plaintiff:
Bricklayers Insurance and Welfare Fund, Bricklayers Pension Fund, Bricklayers Supplemental Annuity Fund and others
Defendant:
Danco Builders Group, MST General Contracting Restoration, Inc., Western Surety Company and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Roofers, Waterproofers & Allied Workers Local Union No. 8 Annuity Fund, Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Summer Benefit Fund, Winter Benefit Fund, Labor Management Committee Fund, Roofing Industry Promotio v. Vardaris Tech, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv05462
Plaintiff:
Roofers, Waterproofers & Allied Workers Local Union No. 8 Annuity Fund, Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Summer Benefit Fund, Winter Benefit Fund, Labor Management Committee Fund, Roofing Industry Promotio
Defendant:
Vardaris Tech, Inc. and Elias Rizos
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Bricklayers Insurance And Welfare Fund et al v. Rad And D'Aprile, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv04137
Plaintiff:
Bricklayers Insurance And Welfare Fund, Bricklayers Pension Fund, Bricklayers Supplemental Annuity Fund and others
Defendant:
Rad And D'Aprile, Inc. and Andrew H Feldman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Bricklayers Insurance And Welfare Fund et al v. 82 Contracting Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv04138
Plaintiff:
Bricklayers Insurance And Welfare Fund, Bricklayers Pension Fund, Bricklayers Supplemental Annuity Fund and others
Defendant:
82 Contracting Inc. and Jeffrey S. Kirchner
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
U.A. Local 342 Joint Labor-Management Committee et al v. Manuel P. Walker d/b/a Walker's Plumbing Services, a sole ownership
as 4:2021cv05681
Plaintiff:
U.A. Local 342 Joint Labor-Management Committee, Northern California Pipe Trades Pension Trust, Northern California Pipe Trades Supplemental 401(k) Retirement Plan and others
Defendant:
Manuel P. Walker d/b/a Walker's Plumbing Services, a sole ownership and Manuel P. Walker a sole ownership doing business as Walker's Plumbing Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Bricklayers Insurance and Welfare Fund et al. v. Universal Preservation Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv04077
Plaintiff:
Bricklayers Insurance and Welfare Fund, et al., Bricklayers Insurance and Welfare Fund, Bricklayers Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
Universal Preservation Group, Inc., Leon D. DeMatteis Construction Corporation, Arch Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Bricklayers Insurance and Welfare Fund et al v. Providence Construction Corp. et al
as 1:2021cv03331
Plaintiff:
Bricklayers Local 1, International Union of Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers, Bricklayers Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
Sailajia Chitta and Providence Construction Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BRIDGE, STRUCTURAL, ORNAMENTAL AND REINFORCING IRON WORKERS LCOAL UNION NO. 22 et al v. MILLENNIUM STEEL, INC.
as 1:2021cv01639
Plaintiff:
IRON WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO. 22 RETIREE INSURANCE TRUST FUND, IRON WORKERS LABOR MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE OF CENTRAL INDIANA, INC., IRON WORKERS LOCALUNION NO 22 and others
Defendant:
MILLENNIUM STEEL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Bricklayers Insurance and Welfare Fund et al v. Hilt Construction, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv03054
Plaintiff:
Bricklayers Local 1, Jack Argila, Bricklayers and Trowel Trades International Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
M. Ilyas Chaudry and Hilt Construction Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1131 ERISA - Collection of Delinquent Trust Fun
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
