Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Clarke et al v. Balfour Beatty Communities LLC et al
as 7:2022cv00019
Plaintiff:
James Banner, Kayla Banner, Michael Clarke and others
Defendant:
Balfour Beatty Communities LLC, Lackland Family Housing, LLC doing business as Lackland Family Homes, Fort Bliss/White Sands Missile Range Housing LP doing business as Fort Bliss Family Homes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Ashliman et al v. Balfour Beatty Communities LLC et al
as 5:2022cv00106
Plaintiff:
Joshua Ashliman, Kelly Ashliman, Mackenzie Ashliman and others
Defendant:
Balfour Beatty Communities LLC, Lackland Family Housing, LLC d/b/a Lackland Family Homes, Fort Bliss/White Sands Missile Range Housing LP d/b/a Fort Bliss Family Homes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Banner et al v. Balfour Beatty Communities LLC et al
as 5:2021cv00550
Plaintiff:
Margarete Wilder-Keever, Cody Straight, Rebecca Dozier and others
Defendant:
AETC Housing, LP d/b/a Sheppard AFB Homes, Balfour Beatty Communities LLC, Lackland Family Housing, LLC d/b/a Lackland Family Homes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Monterey Bay Military Housing, LLC et al v. Ambac Assurance Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv09193
Defendant:
Danny Ray, Chetan Marfatia, AMBAC Assurance Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Sill Housing, LLC, Vandenberg Housing LP, Riley Communities LLC and others
Respondent:
U.S. Army and U.S. Air Force
Not Classified By Court:
Malvern Capital
Applicant:
Jones Lang LaSalle Americas, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Monterey Bay Military Housing, LLC et al v. Ambac Assurance Corporation et al
as 5:2017cv04992
Defendant:
Danny Ray, Jefferies LLC, Jefferies & Company, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Sill Housing, LLC, Vandenberg Housing LP, Riley Communities LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
