Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Bralen Jordan v. BOP, et al
as 21-3301
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRALEN LAMAR JORDAN
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., Director, General Counsel and others
Jordan v. United States Federal Bureau Of Prisons et al
as 3:2021cv50423
Plaintiff:
Braden Lamar Jordan and Bralen Lamar Jordan
Defendant:
United States Federal Bureau Of Prisons, United States, Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierre Jordan v. USA
as 21-5689
Petitioner / Appellant:
PIERRE LAMAR JORDAN
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jordan v. Santos
as 3:2021cv50134
Defendant:
Mr. Santos
Plaintiff:
Bralen Lamar Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. Santos et al
as 3:2021cv50131
Defendant:
R. Santos, Mr. Gross, C. Overberg and others
Plaintiff:
Bralen Lamar Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bralen Jordan v. J. Dix, et al
as 21-1314
Defendant / Appellee:
C. PENDLEY, Correctional Officer, B WILLIAMS, Lieutenant, M. GASTON, Correctional Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRALEN LAMAR JORDAN
Jordan v. Dix et al
as 3:2021cv50060
Defendant:
C. Pendley, M. Gaston, Lt. J. Dix and others
Plaintiff:
Bralen Lamar Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bralen Jordan v. USA, et al
as 21-1171
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRALEN LAMAR JORDAN
Bralen Jordan v. BOP, et al
as 21-1058
Defendant / Appellee:
IAN CONNORS, National Inmate Appeal Administrator and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRALEN LAMAR JORDAN
Jordan v. United States of America et al
as 3:2020cv50514
Plaintiff:
Bralen Lamar Jordan
Defendant:
Ian Connors, Jeffrey Ray Ormond, Kevin Kerbs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
