Cases filed in New Jersey
AURIEMMA V. BLOOMFIELD MUNICIPAL COURT, et al.
as 2:2020cv02612
Defendant: ESSEX COUNTY FEE ARBITRATION, ESSEX COUNTY ETHICS COMMITTEE, BRICK MUNICIPALITY and others
Plaintiff: ANTHONY AURIEMMA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GORDON v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. et al
as 3:2018cv08809
Plaintiff: LYNN GORDON
Defendant: HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. , DOLLAR TREE, ABC LANDLORD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PUNGINA v. BATTERY VIEW SENIOR CITIZENS HOUSING MANAGEMENT LANDLORD
as 2:2017cv05141
Plaintiff: GALINA PUNGINA
Defendant: BATTERY VIEW SENIOR CITIZENS HOUSING MANAGEMENT LANDLORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
MURPHY et al v. THE HOME DEPOT et al
as 3:2015cv02821
Plaintiff: ROBERT MURPHY and BARBARA MURPHY
Defendant: THE HOME DEPOT , JOHN DOE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 1-5, JOHN DOE LANDLORD 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PAXIA v. ARAMARK et al
as 3:2013cv01406
Plaintiff: PATRICIA PAXIA
Defendant: ARAMARK , ABC MAINTENANCE COMPANY, DEF LANDLORD and others
Cross_claimant: ARAMARK
Cross_defendant: ABC COMPANY, ABC MAINTENANCE COMPANY, DEF ENTITY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Rhett v. Hudson County Child Support Unit et al
as 2:2012cv03560
Plaintiff: ERIC J RHETT
Defendant: HUDSON COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT UNIT, PSE&G Company, FIREMANS INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAHOOD v. COALITION ON AFFORDABLE HOUSING OF NJ et al
as 2:2008cv03400
Plaintiff: GEORGE LAHOOD
Defendant: COALITION ON AFFORDABLE HOUSING OF NJ, US HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, US DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights None
LAHOOD v. US DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 2:2008cv03402
Plaintiff: GEORGE LAHOOD
Defendant: US DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, NJ ATTORNEY GENERAL, NJ SECRETARY OF STATE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?