Cases 71 - 80 of 586
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Imperx, Inc.
as 9:2022cv81638
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Imperx, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271 Patent Infringement
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.v. Video Network Security, LLC
as 1:2022cv01405
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Video Network Security, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. STMicroelectronics, Inc.
as 6:2022cv01120
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
STMicroelectronics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Autel Robotics USA LLC
as 1:2022cv01411
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Autel Robotics USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
CEDAR LANE v. BIO-KEY
as 2:2022cv06225
Plaintiff:
TECHNOLOGIES CEDAR LANE
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL, INC. BIO-KEY
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 183 Patent Infringement
CEDAR LANE TECHNOLOGIES INC. v. LEICA CAMERA INC.
as 2:2022cv06226
Plaintiff:
CEDAR LANE TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Defendant:
LEICA CAMERA INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
v. CEDAR LANE TECHNOLOGIES INC. et al
as 2:2022cv06221
Defendant:
CEDAR LANE TECHNOLOGIES INC. and ZICOM TECHNOLOGY INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
CEDAR LANE TECHNOLOGIES INC. v. ZICOM TECHNOLOGY INC.
as 2:2022cv06222
Plaintiff:
CEDAR LANE TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Defendant:
ZICOM TECHNOLOGY INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
CEDAR LANE TECHNOLOGIES INC. v. ZKTECO USA LLC
as 2:2022cv06218
Plaintiff:
CEDAR LANE TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Defendant:
ZKTECO USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Lane Enterprises, LLC v. Prinsco, Inc.
as 1:2022cv01655
Plaintiff:
Lane Enterprises, LLC
Defendant:
Prinsco, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
