Cases 71 - 80 of 157
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. et al v. The Mobile Zoo et al
as 1:2016cv00030
Plaintiff:
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. , Sallie Lane and Anna Ware
Defendant:
The Mobile Zoo and John Hightower
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
United States of America v. Smith
as 4:2015cv02239
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Lane A. Smith
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Aldred v. Green et al
as 1:2015cv02196
Plaintiff:
David Kyle Aldred
Defendant:
Dennis Green and Lane Kilgore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Bank of America NA et al
as 2:2015cv02148
Plaintiff:
Yolanda Lane
Defendant:
Bank of America NA , Nationstar Mortgage LLC and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Woods v. United States of America
as 2:2015cv08026
Petitioner:
Landrus Lane Woods
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hardy v. Kizer et al
as 2:2015cv00635
Plaintiff:
Linda Fay Hardy
Defendant:
James R. Kizer and Lane Heard Trucking, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Johnson v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv00595
Plaintiff:
Otey Lane Johnson
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Radford v. Dunn et al
as 1:2015cv00396
Plaintiff:
Thomas Radford
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, Robert Bentley, Robert Brantley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Elmore County Sheriff's Department (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00510
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lane Walker, Jr.
Defendant:
B J Wilson, Bill Franklin and Deputy Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. 475 Martin Lane, Beverly Hills, California et al
as 2:2015mc03716
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
475 Martin Lane, Beverly Hills, California
Claimant:
Optional Capital, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
