Cases 41 - 50 of 99
Terrell v. The Texas Board of Criminal Justice and Its Board Members et al
as 9:2016cv00007
Plaintiff:
Sheron Gabriel Terrell
Defendant:
The Texas Board of Criminal Justice and Its Board Members, Brad Livingston, Oscar Mendoza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper, Jr. v. Stephens et al
as 9:2015cv00176
Plaintiff:
Earl Daniel Cooper, Jr.
Defendant:
William Stephens, Todd Harris, Shirley Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mills v. Langley et al
as 9:2015cv00165
Plaintiff:
Gregory James Mills
Defendant:
Richard Langley, Mark Duff, Stephanie Seek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Langley v. Colvin
as 3:2015cv02676
Plaintiff:
Scott Casey Langley
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Langley et al v. Green Tree Servicing, LLC et al
as 4:2015cv02063
Plaintiff:
Glen Langley and Anita Langley
Defendant:
Green Tree Servicing, LLC and Flagstar Bank, FSB
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Carr v. Stephens
as 4:2015cv01992
Plaintiff:
Raymond Earl Carr
Defendant:
William Stephens, Major Dawson, Lannette Lithicum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Langley v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2015cv01163
Plaintiff:
Esther Denise Langley
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , Johnson & Johnson Services Inc and Johnson & Johnson Inc
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ibero v. Conifer Insurance Company et al
as 4:2015cv00681
Plaintiff:
Norman Ibero
Defendant:
Conifer Insurance Company and Martin Graham Langley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Humphrey v. Hunter et al
as 9:2015cv00037
Petitioner:
Brison Keith Humphrey
Respondent:
Gary Hunter, Donald Muniz, Richard Langley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cherry v. Officer Dollar et al
as 9:2015cv00030
Plaintiff:
William Cherry
Defendant:
Officer Dollar, Sgt. Rains, Officer Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
