Cases 31 - 38 of 38
Smith v. General Motors LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00178
Defendant:
General Motors LLC, DPH-DAS LLC, Delphi Automotive PLC and others
Plaintiff:
Smith, Amy Smith, Jennifer Lankford and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Brenda Gregory
Respondent:
King & Spalding LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl Diversity-Product Liability
Gordon Hair et al v. General Motors LLC et al
as 1:2014cv05349
Plaintiff:
Gordon Hair, Brenda Hair, Gordon Hair and Brenda Hair and others
Defendant:
General Motors L.L.C. and Does 1 to 25, inclusive
Respondent:
King & Spalding LLP
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Brenda Gregory
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lankford v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00335
Plaintiff:
Nick F. Lankford
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharpe & Dohme Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lankford v. Merck & Co.,Inc.
as 1:2009cv01354
Plaintiff:
Patsy Diane Lankford
Defendant:
Merck & Co.,Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv05232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00981
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lankford v. CSX Transportation Inc. et al
as 6:2007cv06264
Plaintiff:
John R. Lankford and John R. Lankford
Defendant:
CSX Transportation Inc., Consolidated Rail Corporation and Rochester & Southern Railroad, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Lankford v. CSX Transportation Inc. et al
as 5:2007cv00519
Plaintiff:
John R. Lankford and John R. Lankford
Defendant:
CSX Transportation Inc., Consolidated Rail Corporation and Rochester & Southern Railroad, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
