Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Hooper v. Blaisdell
as 10-1996
Petitioner - Appellant:
OLIVER HOOPER
Respondent - Appellee:
LARRY BLAISDELL, Warden, Northern NH Correctional Facility
Kepple v. Blaisdell
as 1:2010cv00331
Defendant:
Larry Blaisdell
Plaintiff:
Francis E Kepple
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hilton v. Blaisdell, et al
as 10-1293
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD A. HILTON, SR.
Respondent - Appellee:
LARRY BLAISDELL, Warden, Northern NH Correctional Facility
Farrow et al v. Wrenn et al
as 1:2010cv00058
Defendant:
Larry Blaisdell, William L. Wrenn and Susan Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kuperman v. NH Department of Corrections, et al
as 09-2675
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALBERT R. KUPERMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
NH DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BRUCE W. CATTELL, GREG COMPTON and others
:
NH ATTORNEY GENERAL and NH DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Carey v. Blaisdell, et al
as 09-2358
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM J. CAREY
Respondent - Appellee:
LARRY BLAISDELL, Warden, Northern NH Correctional Facility
Robinson v. Blaisdell
as 09-1997
Petitioner - Appellant:
STEPHEN ROBINSON
Respondent - Appellee:
LARRY BLAISDELL, Warden, Northern NH Correctional Facility
Respondent:
CHRIS CALLAHAN, ALAN COBURN, PATRICK DELAHANTY and others
Johnson v. Poulin, et al
as 09-1701
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY DEWAYNE JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT THYNG, Unit Manager, NNHCF, in his individual and official capacities
Defendant:
JOSEPH BACHOFER, Maintenance Supervisor, NNHCF, in his individual and official capacities, LARRY BLAISDELL, Warden, Northern NH Correctional Facility, in his individual and official capacities, DENNIS COX, Major, NNHCF, in his individual and official capacities and others
:
and
Hooper v. Blaisdell
as 1:2008cv00426
Petitioner:
Oliver Hooper
Respondent:
Larry Blaisdell
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
