Cases 1 - 9 of 9
McCormack v. Everest National Insurance Company et al
as 1:2013cv00318
Defendant:
Everest National Insurance Company, Christopher E Caldwell, Ronda K Nichols and others
Plaintiff:
Robert James McCormack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCormack v. Harvey et al
as 1:2013cv00178
Plaintiff:
Robert James McCormack
Defendant:
Donald Harvey, Michael Johnson, Jay Christensen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterson v. Blaksly et al
as 1:2011cv00439
Plaintiff:
Daniel Peterson
Defendant:
Blaksly, Young, Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Day et al v. Board of Corrections et al
as 1:2010cv00401
Plaintiff:
Donald Day, Richard Kelly, Milo Beeson and others
Defendant:
Board of Corrections, Johanna Smith, Kathy Nieko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoak v. Smith et al
as 1:2009cv00680
Plaintiff:
Larry M Hoak
Defendant:
Smith, Sheryl Salaris, Larry Hynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Peterson v. Mary Hicks, et al
as 09-35776
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL L. PETERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MARY HICKS, Nurse Practitioner and employee of CMS, APRIL DAWSON, a medical doctor and employee of CMS, JON ERIC BAILEY, a medical doctor and Director of CMS and others
Thurston v. Reinke et al
as 1:2009cv00339
Plaintiff:
John E. Thurston
Defendant:
Brent Reinke, Larry Hynes, Johanna Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brady v. Reinke et al
as 1:2009cv00322
Plaintiff:
Billy Eugene Brady
Defendant:
Brent Reinke, Zarah Martin, Randy Blades and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stanger v. Prison Health Services et al
as 1:2007cv00231
Plaintiff:
Calvert Lee Stanger
Defendant:
Prison Health Services, Larry Hynes, Vicki Brady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
