Cases 1 - 10 of 12
WILLIAMS v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 5:2024cv00013
Petitioner:
LARRY J WILLIAMS and LARRY JEROME WILLIAMS
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA JACKSON COUNTY and STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JENKINS v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 5:2023cv00101
Petitioner:
LARRY JEROME JENKINS
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILLIAMS v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 5:2019cv00543
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Petitioner:
LARRY JEROME WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILLIAMS v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 3:2019cv04665
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA and FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff:
LARRY JEROME WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JARRETT v BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INC et al
as 3:2019cv03111
Defendant:
BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INC and BP AMERICA PRODUCTION COMPANY
Plaintiff:
LARRY JEROME JARRETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILLIAMS v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2019cv00041
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and PANE
Plaintiff:
LARRY JEROME WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2018cv00280
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LATOYA MASSEY and CONNIE F PITTS
Plaintiff:
LARRY JEROME WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. GEO GROUP INC et al
as 3:2017cv00021
Plaintiff:
LARRY JEROME WILLIAMS
Defendant:
GEO GROUP INC, GEO CARE INC and REGULO CALAYCAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Platts v. Secretary Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2012cv00621
Petitioner:
Larry Jerome Platts, Jr.
Respondent:
Secretary Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ransom v. Carlone
as 1:2010cv21666
Plaintiff:
Larry Jerome Ransom
Defendant:
Deborah Carlone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
