Cases 1 - 10 of 15
(PS) Tevis et al v. State of California Superior Court et al
as 2:2023cv02054
Plaintiff:
Larry Tevis and Nancy Tevis
Defendant:
The State of California Superior Court, Court of Appeal Third Appellate District, Rob Bonita and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
In re: Larry Tevis, et al v. California Department of Veter, et al
as 16-60063
Debtor:
In re: LARRY TEVIS and NANCY TEVIS
Appellant:
LARRY TEVIS and NANCY TEVIS
Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS and JAN P. JOHNSON, Chapter 13 Trustee
In Re: Larry and Nancy Tevis
as 2:2015mc00069
Appellant:
Larry Tevis and Nancy Tevis
Appellee:
California Department of Veterans Affairs
Trustee:
Jan P. Johnson and Office of the U.S. Trustee (Sac)
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01047
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Creditor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Tevis et al v. California Department of Veterans Affairs
as 2:2015cv00972
Plaintiff:
Larry Tevis and Nancy Tevis
Defendant:
California Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Larry Tevis, et al
as 14-60009
Debtor:
In re: LARRY TEVIS and NANCY TEVIS
Appellant:
LARRY TEVIS and NANCY TEVIS
Appellee:
MICHAEL F. BURKART, Chapter 7 Trustee, HOSIET & KOELEWYN, MAX HOSEIT and others
In Re: Larry and Nancy Tevis
as 2:2013mc00082
Appellant:
Larry Tevis and Nancy Tevis
Appellee:
Michael F Burkart
Trustee:
Jan P Johnson
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00316
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00274
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.