Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Thomas v. Laurel County Detention Center
as 6:2023cv00100
Petitioner:
Matthew Wayne Thomas
Respondent:
Laurel County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kelly v. Laurel County Detention Center
as 6:2022cv00111
Plaintiff:
Travis Morgan Kelly
Defendant:
Laurel County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Che-Adkins v. Mosley et al
as 6:2021cv00184
Plaintiff:
Frank Melvin Che-Adkins
Defendant:
Jamie Mosley, Travis Cathers, Shawn Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sizemore v. Laurel County Detention Center
as 6:2021cv00067
Defendant:
Laurel County Detention Center
Plaintiff:
Charles V. Sizemore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Whipple, III v. Laurel County Detention Center, et al
as 21-5047
Defendant / Appellee:
NURSE ADAM, JAILER JAMIE MOSELY, SERGEANT BILLY HOWARD and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT ZENAS WHIPPLE, III
Butler v. Laurel County Detention Center Warden et al
as 3:2020cv00256
Plaintiff:
William Howard Butler
Defendant:
Lt Rocco Bowling, Laurel County Detention Center Warden, Justin Fields and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Popejoy v. Laurel County Detention Center
as 6:2020cv00028
Plaintiff:
Anthony Joseph Popejoy
Defendant:
Laurel County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Popejoy v. Laurel County Detention Center
as 3:2019cv00827
Plaintiff:
Anthony Joseph Popejoy
Defendant:
Laurel County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. State of Kentucky et al
as 6:2019cv00258
Respondent:
Seargant Cathers, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Jason Moesley and others
Petitioner:
Marlon Jermaine Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brock v. Laurel County Detention Center et al
as 6:2019cv00006
Defendant:
Jamie Mosley, Laurel County Detention Center and John and/or Jane Does
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Brock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
