Cases 1 - 10 of 16
MONK v. LAURENS COUNTY DETENTION CENTER et al
as 3:2023cv00035
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE MONK, JR
Defendant:
LAURENS COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, Sheriff Larry Dean and CAPTAIN DONELLE PEACOCK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MONK v. LAURENS COUNTY DETENTION CENTER et al
as 5:2023cv00142
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE MONK, JR
Defendant:
LAURENS COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, SHERIFF LARRY DEAN and CAPTAIN DONELLE PEACOCK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHARLESTON v. LAURENS COUNTY JAIL et al
as 3:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
RODRIQUEZ CHARLESTON
Defendant:
Laurens County Jail, PEACOCK, NURSE CRYSTAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHARLESTON v. LAURENS COUNTY JAIL et al
as 5:2022cv00174
Plaintiff:
RODRIQUEZ CHARLESTON
Defendant:
LAURENS COUNTY JAIL, CAPTAIN PEACOCK and NURSE CRYSTAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holland v. Laurens County Jail
as 3:2018cv00008
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Holland
Defendant:
Laurens County Jail and Amberson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holland v. Laurens County Jail
as 1:2018cv00223
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Holland
Defendant:
Laurens County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coney v. Laurens County Sheriff Department et al
as 3:2017cv00067
Plaintiff:
Victor L. Coney
Defendant:
Laurens County Sheriff Department, Daniel Lampp, Steven Cady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coney v. Laurens County Sheriff Dept. et al
as 4:2017cv00218
Plaintiff:
Victor L. Coney
Defendant:
Laurens County Sheriff Dept., Daniel Lampp, Steven Cady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARTER v. LAURENS COUNTY GEORGIA
as 5:2016cv00222
Petitioner:
BENNIE T CARTER
Respondent:
LAURENS COUNTY GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Edwards v. Laurens County Board of Commissioners et al
as 3:2015cv00025
Plaintiff:
Julius Edwards
Defendant:
Laurens County Board of Commissioners and W. A. Harrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
