Cases 21 - 30 of 583
Dobronski v. On Point Financial Solutions, Inc et al
as 4:2023cv12780
Plaintiff:
Mark W. Dobronski
Defendant:
On Point Financial Solutions, Inc Doing business as Tax Law Advocates and Zaid Mohammad Khatib
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Equine Luxury Properties, Inc. et al v. Commercial Capital Bidco, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01142
Plaintiff:
Equine Luxury Properties, LLC and 138 River Street, LLC
Defendant:
Commercial Credit Bidco, Inc., Trott Law, P.C. and Commercial Capital Bidco, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Negotiable Instrumen
Farr #607251 v. Whitmer et al
as 1:2023cv01135
Plaintiff:
Domonique Demetris Farr #607251
Defendant:
Gretchen Whitmer, Michigan Law Revision Commission and People of the State of Michigan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Brown-Pegues v. Meissner et al
as 1:2023cv12615
Plaintiff:
Jerry Brown-Pegues
Defendant:
Jeffrey Meissner, Ken Van Ells, Mari Beth Zeller and others
Smith v. Rickel et al
as 2:2023cv12538
Plaintiff:
Michelle Smith
Defendant:
John M. Rickel, The Rickel law firm P.C. and Association Dues Assurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Prentice v. Newrez, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv12364
Plaintiff:
Glenn-Michael Prentice, Sr
Defendant:
Newrez, LLC d/b/a Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing, Trott Law, P.C., Marcy Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv12367
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Dobronski v. Russo et al
as 2:2023cv12288
Plaintiff:
Mark W. Dobronski
Defendant:
Anthony J. Russo, Jr. Doing business as The Russo Firm, Anthony John Russo, Jr. Doing business as RP Law LLC, Matthew A. Dolman P.A. Doing business as Dolman Law Group and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00926
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Rojas v. DV Injury Law PLLC et al
as 2:2023cv12140
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alejandro Rojas and Jorge Alejandro Rojas [E-filer]
Defendant:
DV Injury Law PLLC, Venar Raad Ayar and Daniel P Heilbrun
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
