Cases 1 - 10 of 1,270
Alabama, State of et al v. Cardona et al
as 7:2024cv00533
Plaintiff:
Alabama, State of, Florida, State of, Georgia, State of and others
Defendant:
Miguel Cardona and U.S. Department of Education
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Adams v. Holler Law Firm et al
as 1:2024cv01506
Plaintiff:
Sherry Adams
Defendant:
Holler Law Firm, Najarian Capital, LLC, Scott K. Camp and Associates, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Edwards v. Bucci et al
as 4:2024cv00061
Defendant:
Noelani G. Skipper, Judge Dean Bucci, Jerald David Westmorland and others
Plaintiff:
Kamiliah Edwards
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80244
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00308
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Simon Tusha, et al v. James Richmond, et al
as 24-10073
Plaintiff:
SIMON TUSHA and TIDE, LLC
Defendant:
JAMES RICHMOND, JEANNE RICHMOND, IEPRENEUR, LLC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Grady Memorial Hospital Corporation et al v Smith Design Studios
as 1:2023cv05670
Plaintiff:
Grady Memorial Hospital Corporation and Law Offices of Ronald I. Kaplan, MD, LLC
Defendant:
Smith Design Studios, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
