Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Berrios v. Lawlor et al
as 8:2020cv03193
Plaintiff:
Osbaldo Lemus Berrios
Defendant:
Mr. Michael E. Lawlor and Lawlor, & Englert L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Aigbekaen v. Barr et al
as 8:2020cv00169
Defendant:
Ayu Ducao, Robert K. Hur, Michael Lawlor and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond I. Aigbekaen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv
Lawlor et al v. Maryland State Police, et al.
as 1:2019cv01394
Plaintiff:
Rennae Lawlor, Matthew Lawlor and Sean Lawlor
Defendant:
State of Maryland, James Kerlin Price, Town of Ocean City and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jenkins v. Lawlor & Englert Law Firm
as 8:2019cv01277
Defendant:
Lawlor & Englert Law Firm
Plaintiff:
Thomas K. Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lowery v. Sholter et al
as 1:2013cv01463
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Lowery
Defendant:
C. Sholter and S. Lawlor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawlor & Associates, Inc. v. Thomas et al
as 8:2013cv00710
Plaintiff:
Lawlor & Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
Doriann R. Thomas, Capitol Radiology, LLC and Beyond Diagnostics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Barry v. Watkins et al
as 8:2012cv00161
Plaintiff:
Ron Barry
Defendant:
H. Thomas Watkins , David P. Southwell , Timothy C. Barabe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hurhula v. Watkins, et al
as 8:2012cv00119
Plaintiff:
Brian Hurhula
Defendant:
H. Thomas Watkins , Argeris N. Karabelas , Richard J. Danzig and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Forgione v. Watkins et al
as 8:2011cv03680
Plaintiff:
Edward L. Forgione, Jr.
Defendant:
H. Thomas Watkins, Argeris N. Karabelas, Richard J. Danzig and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pokoik v. Human Genome Sciences Inc. et al
as 8:2011cv03353
Plaintiff:
Davin Pokoik
Defendant:
Human Genome Sciences Inc., H. Thomas Watkins, Timothy C. Barabe and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
