Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Hill et al v. CitiMortgage, Inc.
as 4:2014cv00090
Plaintiff:
Lawrence M Hill, Perla Ponce and Eunice Ponce
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Onyancha et al v. First Horizon Home Loan Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv04012
Plaintiff:
Peter Onyancha and Lawrence M Hill
Defendant:
First Horizon Home Loan Corporation and First Horizon Home Loans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ponce et al v. CitiMortgage, Inc.
as 4:2013cv00772
Plaintiff:
Perla Ponce, Eunice Ponce and Lawrence M. Hill
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Bustillos et al v. Bank of America NA
as 3:2013cv03589
Plaintiff:
Denise Bustillos and Lawrence M. Hill
Defendant:
Bank of America NA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hill v. BAC Home Loans Servicing LP
as 3:2013cv03044
Plaintiff:
Lawrence M. Hill
Defendant:
BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Hill v. BAC Home Loans Servicing LP et al
as 3:2013cv03043
Plaintiff:
Lawrence M Hill
Defendant:
BAC Home Loans Servicing LP and New Century Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Bent et al v. Mackie Wolfe Zientz & Mann PC et al
as 3:2013cv02038
Plaintiff:
Lydia Bent and Lawrence M Hill
Defendant:
US Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CLARK-BEY v. STATE OF MARYLAND et al
as 1:2013cv00148
Petitioner:
AMUN RA CLARK-BEY
Respondent:
STATE OF MARYLAND, DISTRICT COURT OF MARYLAND FOR PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, BEN C. CLYBURN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CLARK-BEY v. STATE OF MARYLAND, et al.,
as 1:2013cv00149
Plaintiff:
AMUN RA CLARK-BEY
Defendant:
STATE OF MARYLAND, MARTIN O'MALLEY, DOUG GANSLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lawrence Eugene Hill v. United States of America
as 2:2010cv03320
Petitioner:
Lawrence Eugene Hill
Respondent:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
