Cases 1 - 10 of 10
(PC) Mack v. Schwarzneggar et al
as 2:2024cv01221
Plaintiff:
Anthony E. Mack
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzneggar, Edmund G. Brown, Gavin Newsom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Valdez v. Newsom et al
as 1:2023cv00096
Plaintiff:
Michael Rodney Valdez
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom, K. Hixon, B. Chapman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nguon v. Glynn et al
as 3:2021cv02113
Plaintiff:
Hung Duong Nguon
Defendant:
Mary Anne Glynn, Steven Roberts, John Hodges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Moye v. Lang et al
as 3:2014cv02791
Plaintiff:
Malinka Tacuma Wade Moye
Defendant:
Gayle Lang, Richard Corrica Lyons, Leanne Lorrales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tucker v. Cline, et al.
as 1:2013cv00400
Plaintiff:
Gerald L. Tucker
Defendant:
Phillip J. Cline, Kimberly Smith, David L. Alavezos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tucker v. Cline, et al.
as 2:2013cv00279
Plaintiff:
Gerald L. Tucker
Defendant:
Phillip J. Cline, Kimberly Smith, David L. Alavezos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ransom v. State of California et al
as 1:2009cv01688
Plaintiff:
Leonard Ransom, Jr.
Defendant:
State of California, James Tilton and Leann Chrones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Crones et al
as 2:2007cv02004
Petitioner:
Jarmaal Smith
Respondent:
LeAnn Crones and Attorney General of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Creedon v. Central California Womans Facility et al
as 1:2007cv01354
Plaintiff:
Leanne Creedon
Defendant:
Central California Womans Facility, Lujan A. Yard, Willis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Crones et al
as 2:2007cv00964
Plaintiff:
Jarmaal Laronde Smith
Defendant:
LeAnn Crones, Tom Felker, Edward Simmerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
