Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
In re: Suboxone (Buprenorphine/Naloxone) Film Products Liability Litigation
as 1:2024md03092
Defendant: Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc., Indivior, Inc., Indivior PLC and others
Plaintiff: Plaintiffs Co-Lead Counsel, Plaintiffs Executive Committee and Plaintiffs Liaison Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Luke Waid, et al v. Richard Snyder, et al
as 22-1754
Not Classified By Court: In re: FLINT WATER CASES
Plaintiff: LUKE WAID
Plaintiff / Appellee: CO-LEAD COUNSEL FOR THE SETTLEMENT CLASS and CO-LIAISON COUNSEL FOR THE INDIVIDUAL PLAINTIFFS
Defendant: RICHARD DALE SNYDER
Appellant: MELVIN JONES, JR.
Luke Waid, et al v. Richard Snyder, et al
as 22-1756
Not Classified By Court: In re: FLINT WATER CASES
Plaintiff: LUKE WAID
Plaintiff / Appellee: CO-LEAD COUNSEL FOR THE SETTLEMENT CLASS and CO-LIAISON COUNSEL FOR THE INDIVIDUAL PLAINTIFFS
Defendant: RICHARD DALE SNYDER
Appellant: MELVIN JONES, JR.
Luke Waid, et al v. Richard Snyder, et al
as 22-1347
Not Classified By Court: In re: FLINT WATER CASES
Plaintiff: LUKE WAID
Plaintiff / Appellee: CO-LEAD COUNSEL FOR THE SETTLEMENT CLASS and CO-LIAISON COUNSEL FOR THE INDIVIDUAL PLAINTIFFS
Defendant: RICHARD DALE SNYDER
Appellant: MELVIN JONES, JR.
Luke Waid, et al v. Richard Snyder, et al
as 22-1197
Not Classified By Court: In re: FLINT WATER CASES
Plaintiff: LUKE WAID
Plaintiff / Appellee: CO-LEAD COUNSEL FOR THE SETTLEMENT CLASS and CO-LIAISON COUNSEL FOR THE INDIVIDUAL PLAINTIFFS
Defendant: RICHARD DALE SNYDER
Appellant: HELEN CHAPMAN, DOROTHY CHAPMAN, SHAMIYA CHAPMAN and others
Luke Waid, et al v. Richard Snyder, et al
as 22-1185
Not Classified By Court: In re: FLINT WATER CASES
Plaintiff: LUKE WAID
Plaintiff / Appellee: CO-LEAD COUNSEL FOR THE SETTLEMENT CLASS and CO-LIAISON COUNSEL FOR THE INDIVIDUAL PLAINTIFFS
Appellant: RAYMOND HALL, ROBERT HEMPEL and ASHLEY JANKOWIAK
Defendant: RICHARD DALE SNYDER
Luke Waid, et al v. Richard Snyder, et al
as 22-1187
Not Classified By Court: In re: FLINT WATER CASES
Plaintiff: LUKE WAID
Plaintiff / Appellee: CO-LEAD COUNSEL FOR THE SETTLEMENT CLASS and CO-LIAISON COUNSEL FOR THE INDIVIDUAL PLAINTIFFS
Defendant: RICHARD DALE SNYDER
Appellant: COLLEEN CONNORS
Endo Health Solutions, Inc., et alIn re: Endo Health Solutions, Inc., et al
as 21-3041
Respondent: PLAINTIFF'S EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE, PLAINTIFF'S LIAISON COUNSEL and PLAINTIFF'S CO-LEAD COUNSEL
Petitioner: PAR PHARMACEUTICALS COMPANIES, INC, In re: ENDO HEALTH SOLUTIONS, INC., PAR PHARMACAUTICAL, INC and others
Not Classified By Court: NATIONAL PRESCRIPTION OPIATE LITIGATION
In Re: National Prescription Opiate Litigation
as 1:2017md02804
Defendant: National Prescription Opiate Litigation, McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff: City of Toledo, City of Lorain, County of Cuyahoga and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff: Allergan Finance LLC, HBC Service Company, Discount Drug Mart, Inc. and others
Interested Party: United States, U.S. Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Administration, Webb County, TX and others
Intervenor: USA Today, Chicago Tribune Company, Los Angeles Times and others
Special Master: Francis McGovern, David Rosenblum Cohen and Cathy Yanni
Respondent: Linda Singer and Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC
3Rd Party Defendant: Jane Does, Pfizer Inc., King Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Counter Defendant: Scott County Indiana Board of Commissioners
Counter Claimant: Christopher C. Smith and James Coomer
Not Classified By Court: State of Ohio Board of Pharmacy
Amicus Curiae: Manatee Memorial Hospital, Allegiance Health Center of Ruston, Allegiance Specialty Hospital of Greenville and others
Petitioner: Paul Andrew Pyfer, David B. Gustin, Kenneth Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Filing Error
as 1:2017cv01649
Plaintiff: Plaintiff Lead Counsel
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?