Cases 1 - 10 of 12
James Biggins v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 13-1498
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant:
CARL C. DANBERG, THOMAS L. CARROLL, MIKE DELOY and others
Not Party:
DR. CLAUDIA PARKER
Crichlow v. Doe et al
as 1:2012cv00303
Plaintiff:
Keino S. Crichlow
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe, Commissioner of Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Biggins v. Carl Danberg
as 12-1411
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
CARL C. DANBERG, THOMAS L. CARROLL, MIKE DELOY and others
Biggins v. Phelps et al
as 1:2011cv00388
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
Perry Phelps, Christopher Klien, David Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Biggins v. Jack Markell, et al
as 10-2940
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
JACK A. MARKELL, CARL C. DANBERG, THOMAS C. CARROLL and others
Biggins v. Markell et al
as 1:2010cv00250
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
Jack A. Markell, Carl Danberg, Thomas Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holland v. Danberg et al
as 1:2009cv00910
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Holland
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Richard Kearney, Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holland v. C.M.S. et al
as 1:2009cv00776
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Holland
Defendant:
C.M.S., Tracy Wilkens, Stephen Horton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goddard v. Delaware Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2008cv00569
Plaintiff:
Regent Goddard
Defendant:
Delaware Department of Corrections, Carl Danberg, Stan Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jesus Diaz v. Thomas Carroll
as 08-3665
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JESUS DIAZ
Defendant - Appellee:
CORR MED SER, LEE ANN DUNN, DEBBIE RODWELLER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
