Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Renaud, et al v. Ross, et al
as 23-8007
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL A. RENAUD, CHRISTOPHER D. HARRELL and CHRISTOPHER HARRELL
Defendant / Appellee:
GEORGE ROSS, Wyoming Department of Corrections Medium Correctional Institution Administrative Sergeant in his individual and official capacity, NATHANIEL OLENICK, Wyoming Department of Corrections Medium Correctional Institution Security Officer Olenick in his individual and official capacity, KAELI HANSEN, Wyoming Department of Corrections Medium Correctional Institution Security Officer Hansen in her individual and official capacity, a/k/a Officer Hansen and others
Renaud et al v Ross et al
as 1:2022cv00212
Defendant:
Wyoming Department of Corrections Medium Correctional Institution Administrative Sergeant, Wyoming Department of Corrections Medium Correctional Institution Security Officer Olenick, Wyoming Department of Corrections Medium Correctional Institution Security Officer Hansen and others
Plaintiff:
Paul A Renaud and Christopher D Harrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
DeMillard v. Burton, et al
as 14-8032
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC LEVANTER DEMILLARD
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD BURTON, Wyoming Department of Corrections Medium Correctional Institution Therapist, DR. HARBANS HANS, Wyoming Department of Corrections Medium Correctional Institution Psychiatrist, STEVE HARGETT, Warden, Wyoming Department of Corrections Medium Correctional Institution Warden and others
DeMillard v. Wyoming Department of Correction Medium Correctional Institution Therapist et al
as 2:2014cv00016
Plaintiff:
Eric Levanter DeMillard
Defendant:
Wyoming Department of Correction Medium Correctional Institution Therapist, Richard Burton, Wyoming Department of Corrections Medium Correctional Institution Psychiatrist and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
