Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Gibson v. Ingraham
as 21-1664
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Bennie Gibson
Defendant / Appellee:
Young, Correctional Officer, Coxsackie Correctional Facility and Ingraham, Correctional Officer, Coxsackie Correctional Facility
Defendant:
Brian S. Fischer, Commissioner of New York State Department of Correctional Services, Deputy Commissioner, New York State Department of Correctional Services, ADA Perez, Warden, Downstate Correctional Facility and others
Gibson v. Ingraham
as 19-477
Defendant:
John Does 1-3, 5-6, Correctional Officers, Adirondack Correctional Facility, Maher, Correctional Officer,Adirondack Correctional Facility, Harris, Correctional Officer, Coxsackie Correctional Facility and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Ingraham, Correctional Officer, Coxsackie Correctional Facility and Young, Correctional Officer, Coxsackie Correctional Facility
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Bennie Gibson
Gibson v. Fischer
as 10-5217
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Bennie Gibson
Defendant - Appellee:
Brian Fischer, Commissioner of New York State Department of Correctional Services, Deputy Commissioner, New York State Department of Correctional Services, ADA Perez, Warden, Downstate Correctional Facility and others
McCoy v. Bisceglia
as 1:2010cv08707
Petitioner:
Kemp McCoy
Respondent:
Leo Bisceglia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gibson v. Ingraham, et al.
as 9:2010cv00968
Plaintiff:
Bennie Gibson
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, Deputy Commissioner, Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Labrador v. Fischer et al
as 9:2009cv01155
Plaintiff:
Angel Labrador
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, Leo Bisceglia and Herbert Bergamini
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Desir v. DOCS et al
as 9:2009cv00964
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Desir
Defendant:
DOCS, Brian Fischer, Leo Bisceglia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
