Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 42
Leroy Wells v. Sue Washburn
as 20-35953
Respondent / Appellee: SUE WASHBURN
Petitioner / Appellant: LEROY LAMONT WELLS
Wells v. Washburn
as 2:2020cv00968
Petitioner: Leroy Lamont Wells
Respondent: Sue Washburn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Maney et al v. Brown et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2020cv00570
Plaintiff: Paul Maney, Theron Hall, Sheryl Lynn Sublet and others
Defendant: Mark Nooth, Colette Peters, Rob Persson and others
Amicus Curiae: D.O. Michael Puisis, M.D. Robert Cohen and M.D. Joseph Goldenson
Interested Party: Leroy Lamont Wells and Samuel Buchanan
Petitioner: Bobbin Singh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leroy Wells v. Sue Washburn
as 19-72591
Petitioner: LEROY LAMONT WELLS
Respondent: SUE WASHBURN
Leroy Wells v. Colette Peters, et al
as 19-35422
Defendant / Appellee: COLETTE S. PETERS, JERI TAYLOR and MICHAEL F. GOWER
Plaintiff / Appellant: LEROY LAMONT WELLS
Wells v. Kruse et al
as 6:2018cv01919
Plaintiff: Leroy Lamont Wells
Defendant: David Saydack, Daniel R. Kruse and Neil F. Byl
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leroy Wells v. Ellen Rosenblum, et al
as 17-36029
Plaintiff - Appellant: LEROY LAMONT WELLS
Defendant - Appellee: ELLEN F. ROSENBLUM, SAMUEL ABRAHAM KUBERNICK, ANNA M. JOYCE and others
Leroy Wells v. Collette Peters, et al
as 17-35820
Petitioner - Appellant: LEROY LAMONT WELLS
Respondent - Appellee: COLLETTE PETERS, JERI TAYLOR and MIKE GOWER
Leroy Wells v. Bridgette Amsberry, et al
as 17-35815
Petitioner - Appellant: LEROY LAMONT WELLS
Respondent - Appellee: BRIDGETTE AMSBERRY, COLLETTE PETERS, BRIAN BELLEQUE and others
Wells v. Amsberry et al
as 2:2017cv01602
Respondent: Bridgitte Amsberry, Brian Belleque, Michael F. Gower and others
Petitioner: Leroy Lamont Wells
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?