Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Andre Thomas v. Brian Reynolds, et al
as 16-3889
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDRE R. THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN REYNOLDS, NATASHA HOLLINGSWORTH, DR. STEPHANIE STREET, executive director and others
Thomas v. Department of Corrections
as 1:2015cv01035
Plaintiff:
Andre R. Thomas
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Dr. Spraga, Dr. Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mendez v. Phelps et al
as 1:2014cv00467
Petitioner:
Ivan L. Mendez
Respondent:
Perry Phelps, Leslie Sexton, Attorney General of the State of Delaware and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mendez et al v. Sexton et al
as 1:2013cv01588
Plaintiff:
Ivan L. Mendez, My Family and the Ex Presidents of America, Jimmy Carter and others
Defendant:
Leslie Sexton, Perry Phelps, Personnell Workers of the Support Services Office of the J.T.V.C.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mendez et al v. Personnell Workers of the Support Services Office of the J.T.V.C.C. et al
as 1:2013cv01581
Plaintiff:
Ivan L. Mendez, My Family and the Ex Presidents of America, Jimmy Carter and others
Defendant:
Leslie Sexton, Perry Phelps and Personnell Workers of the Support Services Office of the J.T.V.C.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Copening v. Rispoli et al
as 1:2013cv01554
Plaintiff:
Stephen Copening
Defendant:
Rispoli, Unknown Major, Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mendez v. Sexton, et al
as 1:2013cv01133
Plaintiff:
Ivan L. Mendez
Defendant:
Leslie Sexton, Biological Family of Leslie Sexton and Workers at Telekinesis Room
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Raymond Thornton v. West, et al
as 13-1384
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND E. THORNTON
Defendant - Appellee:
WEST, MUSSER, LAURO B. DIAZ, JR. and others
Maynard v. Hastings et al
as 1:2012cv00732
Plaintiff:
Michael W. Maynard
Defendant:
Sam Hastings, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
