Cases 1 - 9 of 9
BLOOM v. ASBURY PARTNERS, LLC.
as 3:2018cv12193
Defendant:
ASBURY PARTNERS, LLC. and MADISON ASBURY RETAIL, LLC
Plaintiff:
LEWIS BLOOM
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
THE CAMBRIDGE SCHOOL v. THE LEWIS SCHOOL OF PRINCETON
as 3:2018cv01971
Plaintiff:
THE CAMBRIDGE SCHOOL
Defendant:
THE LEWIS SCHOOL OF PRINCETON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
GOLD v. METZ LEWIS LAW FIRM LLC, ET AL et al
as 1:2014cv00040
Plaintiff:
DENNIS D. GOLD
Defendant:
METZ LEWIS LAW FIRM LLC, ET AL , STEVEN PETRIKIS, ESQUIRE , SUSAN SMOLLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
BROADCAST MUSIC, INC et al v. 19TH STREET HOLDINGS, INC et al
as 2:2012cv00927
Plaintiff:
BROADCAST MUSIC, INC , ANITA POINTER PUBLISHING , EMI BLACKWOOD MUSIC, INC. and others
Defendant:
19TH STREET HOLDINGS, INC , JOHN C. LEWIS , EDWARD P. LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
MARINO v. USHER
as 2:2011cv06811
Defendant:
TERRY STEVEN LEWIS, EMI MUSIC PUBLISHING, INC., WARNER-TAMERLINE PUBLISHING CORP. and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL V. MARINO
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
BRUSS v. MACDOUGAL et al
as 2:2008cv06281
Plaintiff:
LEWIS J. BRUSS
Defendant:
JOHN MACDOUGAL and DIANA HOFFMAN
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. Thoman Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv02086
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc., George Thorogood, Spirit One Music and others
Defendant:
Thoman Enterprises, Inc., Chris L. Thoman and Annette A. Thoman
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
ERA FRANCHISE SYSTEMS, INC. v. LEWIS REALTY COMPANY, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv04877
Plaintiff:
ERA FRANCHISE SYSTEMS, INC.
Defendant:
LEWIS REALTY COMPANY, INC., JUDITH L. LEWIS and THE ESTATE OF JEFFREY LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
BRUSS v. BERGER et al
as 2:2007cv03348
Plaintiff:
LEWIS JOSEPH BRUSS
Defendant:
LAWRENCE S. BERGER, BERGER AND BORNSTEIN and U.S. LAND RESOURCES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
