Cases 1 - 8 of 8
LIANG v. SOLAR CONNECTION INC.
as 2:2018cv05098
Defendant:
SOLAR CONNECTION INC.
Plaintiff:
LI LIANG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sino Clean Energy, Inc. v. Robert Seiden
as 17-15316
Debtor:
In the Matter of: SINO CLEAN ENERGY, INC.
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SINO CLEAN ENERGY, INC., acting by and through BAOWEN REN, PENG ZHOU, WENJIE ZHANG, ZHIXIN JING, and PAUL CHUI; and HUIQIN CHEN, LI HAN, GUANGJON HUANG, XIAODONG JIANG, XUELING JING, YUFENG LI, HAICHO LI, LANYING LI, LIANG WANG, ZHEN WU, TING XTE, HESHUN
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT W. SEIDEN, in his capacity as Receiver over Sino Clean Energy Inc.
Estee Lauder Cosmetics Ltd. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2016cv11026
Plaintiff:
Estee Lauder Cosmetics Ltd. and Make-Up Art Cosmetics Inc.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Zhao Yantao, Zixing Wang and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Bulgari, S.p.A. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2015cv05148
Plaintiff:
Bulgari, S.p.A.
Defendant:
Zou Xiaohong, et al., Zou Xiaohong, Whois Privacy Protection Service, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Chen v. Holder
as 13-1802
Petitioner:
Li-Liang Chen
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Zhou v. Elaine's Asian Bistro Corp. et al
as 2:2012cv05582
Defendant:
John Doe, Elaine's Asian Bistro Corp. and Elaine Ho
Plaintiff:
Li Liang Zhou
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv02802
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01681
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
