Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00389
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Cara et al v. Salley
as 2:2023cv00803
Defendant:
Scott Lacy Salley, Scott Lacey Salley and Scott J Smith
Plaintiff:
Cara, Jenny and Lily
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01170
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Amazon.com, Inc. et al v. Jiang et al
as 2:2018cv00356
Plaintiff:
Amazon.com, Inc. and Vera Bradley Designs Inc
Defendant:
Wei "Tony" Jiang , Daixiuzhen Diaxuzhen , Dai Xiuzhen Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Hall v. Berryhill
as 3:2017cv05608
Defendant:
Nancy A Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Lily June Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Stockwell et al v. Port of Seattle et al
as 2:2016cv00483
Plaintiff:
Charles R Stockwell, Sr and Lily Stockwell
Defendant:
Port of Seattle , Sean Gillebo , Jane Doe Gillebo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steiner et al v. IPEX USA Inc et al
as 2:2010cv00272
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Steiner, William Burns, Lily Burns and others
Defendant:
IPEX USA Inc, IPEX USA LLC, IPEX USA Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
Burmaster v. United States of America et al
as 2:2009cv01384
Plaintiff:
Brian Burmaster
Defendant:
United States of America, American Psychiatric Association, Abbott Laboratories and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lroy v. Astrue
as 2:2008cv01130
Plaintiff:
Lily Marlene Lroy
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Chan -Ho et al v. Korean Air
as 2:2008cv00805
Plaintiff:
Yin Han Betty Chan -Ho and Lily Chan
Defendant:
Korean Air
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
