Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Forrester v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2019cv01730
Defendant:
HSA Barnes, Dr. J Dunlop, Nurse Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Keith Forrester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01861
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Lin v. Lynch et al
as 4:2017cv02650
Petitioner:
Xiang Quan Lin
Respondent:
Loretta E. Lynch, Jeh Johnson, Rebecca Adducci and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rittner v. Bartlet et al
as 3:2017cv01974
Plaintiff:
Daniel L. Rittner
Defendant:
Melissa Bartlet, Crystal Ester, David Lin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rittner v. Perez et al
as 3:2017cv01862
Plaintiff:
Daniel L. Rittner, Sr.
Defendant:
Carlos A. Perez, Shannon Cole, John Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Han v. Fun Buffet Inc. et al
as 5:2017cv01092
Plaintiff:
Gen Wang Han
Defendant:
Fun Buffet Inc. , Yanxia Zou , Yu Lin and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
United States of America v. Lady's Signed Tiffany & Company Platinum Diamond Engagement Ring, Serial No. 34016593/PO6200175
as 1:2017cv01049
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Lady's Signed Tiffany & Company Platinum Diamond Engagement Ring, Serial No. 34016593/PO6200175
Interested_party:
Robert Lin and William Bryce Murphy
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
In Re: Seizure of Lady's Signed Tiffany & Co. Platinum Diamond Engagement Ring
as 1:2016mc00053
Claimant:
Robert Lin
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
McNeely v. Havlin et al
as 3:2016cv00568
Plaintiff:
Robert McNeely, III
Defendant:
Jim Havlin, John Perez, Thomas Lin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
