Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Zheng v. The Standard Fire Insurance Company
as 2:2025cv00573
Plaintiff:
Yi Lin Zheng
Defendant:
The Standard Fire Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Zheng v. The Standard Fire Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv02172
Defendant:
The Standard Fire Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Yi Lin Zheng
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01968
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00514
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Zheng v. Garland
as 20-3636
Petitioner:
LIN ZHENG
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, JEFFREY A. ROSEN, ACTING UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL and WILLIAM P. BARR, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv11357
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CHEN v. NEW CHINA ROYAL EXPRESS INC. et al
as 2:2016cv08702
Plaintiff:
JIAN CHEN
Defendant:
NEW CHINA ROYAL EXPRESS INC. , YI HUA ZHENG and YU LIN ZHENG
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02563
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Monster Energy Company v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2016cv00622
Plaintiff:
Monster Energy Company
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Xianda Lin, xianda lin 2 and others
Counter_defendant:
Cheapsnapbacks.co.uk
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
