Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Chmura v. Florida et al
as 3:2018cv00077
Plaintiff:
Linda Lan Chmura
Defendant:
State of Florida, 12th Circuit Sarasota County Court, Venice Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chmura v. Florida et al
as 3:2018cv00076
Plaintiff:
Linda Lan Chmura
Defendant:
State of Florida, Kimberly Bonner, Gene Joyce Courts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chmura v. Florida et al
as 3:2017cv02165
Plaintiff:
Linda Lan Chmura
Defendant:
State of Florida, Tallahassee Supreme Court, 2nd District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chmura v. Kurvin et al
as 3:2017cv02163
Plaintiff:
Linda Lan Chmura
Defendant:
Stephen H. Kurvin, Hodges, Avrutis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chmura v. Norton et al
as 3:2017cv02164
Plaintiff:
Linda Lan Chmura
Defendant:
Norton, Hammersley, Lopez & Skokos Inverso PA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chmura v. Sanctuary Pelican Pointe Board of HOA
as 1:2017cv06900
Petitioner:
Linda Lan Chmura
Respondent:
Sanctuary Pelican Pointe Board of HOA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chmura v. Genes, Joyce Courts et al
as 8:2015cv02025
Plaintiff:
Linda Lan Chmura
Defendant:
Genes, Joyce Courts, Kimberly Bonner, Donald, Susan Kerndt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chmura v. Rutenberg et al
as 8:2015cv02023
Plaintiff:
Linda Lan Chmura
Defendant:
Arthur Rutenberg, Sam Rodgers Homes Inc., Calvin J. Domenico, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chmura v. Norton, Hammersley, Lopez & Skokos, Inverso PA et al
as 8:2015cv01981
Plaintiff:
Linda Lan Chmura
Defendant:
Norton, Hammersley, Lopez & Skokos, Inverso PA, ACME Investment Group LLC, John W. Deidre Jago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chmura v. Galen et al
as 8:2015cv01943
Plaintiff:
Linda Lan Chmura
Defendant:
Phyllis Galen, Kimberly Bonner, Rick DeFuria and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
