Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00515
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
FERRELL v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2020cv06179
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC, COOK MEDICAL INCORPORATED and others
Plaintiff:
LINDA M. FERRELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 b3
JACKSON v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv03166
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
LINDA M. JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
CLARK et al v. COOK GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv06069
Plaintiff:
ALMA DELIA AGUILAR, LINDA ALLEN, ANTHONY ATKINS and others
Defendant:
COOK GROUP INC., COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
LOVE v. AETNA et al
as 1:2014cv01671
Defendant:
AETNA and UNISYS CORPORATION LTD PLAN
Plaintiff:
LINDA M. LOVE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
CLAYCOMB v. DAUGHTRY et al
as 4:2013cv00171
Plaintiff:
LINDA M. CLAYCOMB
Defendant:
TERRY E. DAUGHTRY and TIM-BAR CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
SECHREST v. ASTRUE
as 4:2012cv00118
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
LINDA M. SECHREST
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. AWAND et al
as 4:2010mc00016
Defendant:
HOWARD J. AWAND and LINDA M. AWAND
Receiver:
ROBB EVANS & ASSOCIATES, LLC
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
