Cases 1 - 10 of 14
MICHAEL v. DESANTIS et al
as 4:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
LINDA MICHAEL
Defendant:
RON DESANTIS, THOMAS BAKKEDAHL and CYNTHIA COX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MICHAEL v. DESANTIS
as 4:2023cv00506
Plaintiff:
LINDA MICHAEL
Defendant:
RON DESANTIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Linda MichaelIn re: Linda Michael
as 23-13464
Petitioner:
In re: LINDA MICHAEL
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
MICHAEL v. DIXON
as 4:2022cv00414
Petitioner:
LINDA MICHAEL
Respondent:
RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael v. The Abbott Laboratories et al
as 1:2021cv05273
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC, The Abbott Laboratories, Burroughs-Wellcome & Co., Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Linda Michael
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
GROOP INTERNET PLATFORM INC. v. PSYCHOTHERAPY ACTION NETWORK et al
as 1:2019cv01854
Defendant:
PSYCHOTHERAPY ACTION NETWORK, NANCY BURKE, JANICE MUHR and others
Plaintiff:
GROOP INTERNET PLATFORM d/b/a TALKSPACE, GROOP INTERNET PLATFORM INC. and GROOP INTERNET PLATFORM INC. doing business as TALKSPACE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2012cv14417
Plaintiff:
Linda Michael
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections , Florida Department of Corrections and Attorney General of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael v. Jones, et al
as 12-6150
Petitioner - Appellant:
LINDA MICHAEL
Respondent - Appellee:
JUSTIN JONES, Director, O.D.O.C. and MILLICENT NEWTON-EMBRY
Michael v. Newton-Embry, et al
as 12-6129
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LINDA MICHAEL
Defendant - Appellee:
MILLICENT NEWTON-EMBRY, Warden, ANGELA JOHNSON, Case Mgr, RICHARD ARNOLD, Captain/Misconduct Investigator and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
