Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Grandinetti v. Ige et al
as 1:2021cv00079
Defendant:
Max N. Otani, Department of Public Safety, State of Hawaii, George R. Ariyoshi and others
Interested Party:
Laurie Nadamoto and Shelley Harrington
Plaintiff:
Francis Grandinetti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grandinetti v. Abercrombie et al
as 1:2015cv00007
Plaintiff:
Francis Anthony Grandinetti, II
Defendant:
Neil Abercrombie, Shan S. Tsutsui, Brian Schatz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grandinetti v. Abercrombie et al
as 1:2015cv00006
Petitioner:
Francis Grandinetti
Respondent:
Neil Abercrombie, Brian Schatz, Shan S. Tsutsui and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Grandinetti v. Pearl Harbor Day State Holiday et al
as 1:2012cv00666
Plaintiff:
Francis Anthony Grandinetti, II
Defendant:
Pearl Harbor Day State Holiday, State of Hawaii, Territory of Hawaii and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cowser v. Obama et al
as 1:2011cv00180
Plaintiff:
Janis Cowser
Defendant:
Barack Obama, Joe Bider, Thomas J. Vilsack and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Tia v. Lt. Baker et al
as 1:2011cv00098
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Tia
Defendant:
Lt. Baker, Linda Rivera, A/CO Costa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00745
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Ketchmark v. Obama et al
as 1:2010cv00725
Plaintiff:
T. Lee Ketchmark and Jehovah's & Jesus' Kingdom
Defendant:
Barack Obama, Linda Lingle, Mufi Hannemann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00564
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Rapozo v. Lingle et al
as 1:2010cv00493
Plaintiff:
Richard Borges Rapozo
Defendant:
Linda Lingle, Clayton Frank and Tammy Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
