Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Jackson v. LinkedIn Corporation
as 5:2024cv00812
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Jackson
Defendant:
LinkedIn Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gatekeeper Solutions, Inc. v. LinkedIn Corporation
as 3:2023cv05775
Plaintiff:
Gatekeeper Solutions, Inc.
Defendant:
LinkedIn Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Adnexus Incorporated, LLC v. LinkedIn Corporation
as 3:2023cv05102
Plaintiff:
Adnexus Incorporated, LLC
Defendant:
LinkedIn Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Street Spirit IP LLC v. LinkedIn Corporation
as 3:2023cv00884
Plaintiff:
Street Spirit IP LLC
Defendant:
LinkedIn Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
LinkedIn Corporation v. TopSocial24 et al
as 5:2023cv00110
Plaintiff:
LinkedIn Corporation
Defendant:
TopSocial24, SocialBD24, MD Raju Ahamed and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv07718
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
LinkedIn Corporation v. Mantheos Pte. Ltd.
as 4:2022cv00651
Plaintiff:
LinkedIn Corporation
Defendant:
Mantheos Pte. Ltd., Jeremiah Tang, Yuxi Chew and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Crowder et al v. LinkedIn Corporation
as 4:2022cv00237
Plaintiff:
Todd Crowder, Kevin Schulte and Garrick Vance
Defendant:
LinkedIn Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
In re Ex Parte Application of Okst Madencilik San. Tic. A.S.
as 3:2021mc80180
Plaintiff:
Okst Madencilik San. Tic. A.S.
Defendant:
LinkedIn Corp. and Google LLC
Mehl v. LinkedIn Corporation
as 5:2021cv01084
Plaintiff:
Norbert Mehl
Defendant:
LinkedIn Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
