Cases 1 - 7 of 7
TELFORD BOROUGH AUTHORITY v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY et al
as 2:2012cv06548
Plaintiff:
TELFORD BOROUGH AUTHORITY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, REGION 3, LISA P. JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
WEST GOSHEN SEWER AUTHORITY v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY et al
as 2:2012cv05353
Plaintiff:
WEST GOSHEN SEWER AUTHORITY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and LISA P. JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
DELAWARE RIVERKEEPER NETWORK et al v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY et al
as 3:2011cv04302
Plaintiff:
DELAWARE RIVERKEEPER NETWORK and DELAWARE RIVERKEEPER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, LISA P. JACKSON and JUDITH A. ENCK
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
DELAWARE ESTUARY TMDL COALITION et al v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, et al
as 2:2009cv05927
Plaintiff:
DELAWARE ESTUARY TMDL COALITION, CAMDEN COUNTY MUNICIPAL UTILITIES AUTHORITY, CAMDEN COUNTY MUNICIPAL UTILITIES AUTHORITY and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, LISA P. JACKSON, JUDITH ENCK and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Kevin Cummings v. Lisa Jackson
as 08-3363
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN CUMMINGS
Defendant - Appellee:
LISA P. JACKSON, Commissioner N.J. Department of Environmental Protection, Land Use Regulation Program
CUMMINGS v. JACKSON
as 3:2007cv04046
Petitioner:
KEVIN CUMMINGS
Respondent:
LISA P. JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
FIBERMARK NORTH AMERICA, INC. v. JACKSON
as 3:2007cv00839
Plaintiff:
FIBERMARK NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Defendant:
LISA P. JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
